Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Username: Password:
Pages: 1 2 [3]

Author Topic: Which handcontroller would be best for testing functionality without PC  (Read 22289 times)

grizli21

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 28
    • View Profile
Re: Which handcontroller would be best for testing functionality without PC
« Reply #30 on: December 05, 2015, 14:06:46 »
Next is with azeq6 :

Sequence looks the same but axis status code are different.

Logged

TCWORLD

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 809
    • View Profile
    • AstroEQ
Re: Which handcontroller would be best for testing functionality without PC
« Reply #31 on: December 05, 2015, 15:42:36 »
I have a sneaking suspicion that there is more to the protocol than they have published. There seem to be commands going on there that I don't recognise, and extra status bits in the :f command. It's possible that they have made revisions to the command set since they published the protocol.

Unfortunately I haven't got the time at the moment, nor access to a handcontroller to try and reverse engineer what is going on.
Logged
Tom Carpenter (AstroEQ)

grizli21

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 28
    • View Profile
Re: Which handcontroller would be best for testing functionality without PC
« Reply #32 on: December 06, 2015, 08:29:56 »
Ok then maybe when you will be less busy i could send the handbox to you.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]
« previous next »